Lance Winslow, author and business consultant, an article on the proposed new patent law. The contents of the letter until it matters more to the dignity of the new law, probing how important it is worthy of its public relations.
The skepticism was reflected by questions
Winslow specifically questioned the Senate's ability to recognize a reasonable quantity of U.S. patent system, blocking strategies in the United StatesPatent Office. And if ever they are, he wondered how the reliability of these measures will be: they are able to help in the technology sector, providing step forward or are they only appear as the former, which only aggravates the effort for progress in this country?
He also said that although the country has this new policy is not guaranteed, to be followed by other countries. He said he was not sure that this policy will be honoredpresented by other nations, even in the nation.
Explains the proposed new patent law
A lawyer, writer and political commentator Phyllis Schlafly discusses the concept of the new accounting method for a patent. He said that Congress approved reforms to the U.S. Patent Office to persuade the European practice and the Japanese ' granting of patent applications 18 months after filing, even if the decision is not yet completed the issuance of a patent.He said that the reason Congress in this manner, the patent application is allowed to be exempted from disclosure. But this would in any case, under certain conditions, such as the publication of standardized procedures.
The proposed new patent law has not, on the other hand, more credit for the exemption. Instead, the entire patent applications are required to be published 18 months after application, although no decision has yet been made on the grant of a patent.
TheDrawback of the proposed new patent law
U.S. policy has always been granted a patent on the first one to invest anything. However, this type of policy to draft new patent law was amended. Instead of granting a patent, one of the first to invest anything, the patent will be granted on the first file documents.
Schlafly said the new policy will be a great advantage for large companies and is a greatDisadvantages for small apparently. Thus, the first of a policy file is a flood of applications from large companies to crush with sources from multiple submissions. The small inventor Meanwhile, have a tendency to limp into the depths lost.
So to speak, the bill uses new patent assault on the constitutional rights of small businesses and private investors. Schlafly noted that the two very nice of the capitalists, who providePeople, the most important innovations. He justified this by saying that almost one third of total patent applications are files used by small businesses, groups, non-profit, universities and private investors. For this reason, concludes that the bill Schlafly new patent is not something productive, the patent system.
No comments:
Post a Comment